
As long as politicians continue looking up at a debt ceiling and forward at future spending, they will never have to confront the problem they so comfortably wallow in up to their necks today, a problem only they can fix: systemic waste.
Debate in Washington rarely turns to addressing the root of a waste problem which infects all levels of government. There are, of course, talks about how to cut spending, but cutting programs and funding does nothing inherently to cut waste.
Consider this sad-but-true illustration:
I work for a state government institution. Recently, I requested a piece of technology necessary for doing my job. The item retails between $150 and $200 from multiple sellers on Amazon, but since I work at a state institution, the item had to be purchased through an “approved vendor.” The idea is that these vendors will give the state the best possible price. What did the state pay for the item? Over $300.
Instances like that happen every day at thousands of state and federal institutions. If you started to do the math, you would see why our country is in such trouble–not because we spend, but because the system allows “approved” vendors and contractors to fleece the taxpayers. Immovable barriers of bureaucracy have been cleverly constructed to funnel taxpayer dollars right to where the political architects of those barriers want them to go.
The unethical (although not always illegal) and mutually beneficial relationships between the vendors and the politicians who approve them are what really need to be “cut” before operating budgets are sacrificed. If you simply cut funding to government institutions and programs, those entities will lay off employees and deny citizens beneficial services, not fix the problem of corruption at levels beyond their control.
For another example, consider what America is paying for a typical American defense contractor overseas ($150k/year) versus what a typical deployed US soldier makes ($50k). Keep digging and you will find how close the CEOs of the defense contractors are with the representatives who approve paying for their services with your money.
Republicans have for decades successfully sold the half-truth that the cause of government waste is a society full of lazy takers. Admittedly, there are far too many Americans receiving thousands of dollars in un-needed benefits across the country. However, focusing solely on social welfare as the primary source of big government waste has been such a successful diversion for Republicans that their fiscal support of big business and bloated military has gone unchecked—and where the constituents aren’t looking, the politicians are quietly allocating. The Democrats might be giving American welfare queens thousands, but the Republicans are currently giving hundreds of billions to foreigners by way of defense contracts (only a quarter of defense contractors are Americans).
For too long, freely elected politicians have determined what vendors and contractors get to financially rape the American people with impunity, and that is America’s fatal flaw now. The people chosen to fix the system are the same people who personally benefit by ensuring it stays broken.
Greg said:
I may never eat pork again.
ira1942 said:
Excellent piece J, here is some humor you may like:
THE HAIRCUT
One day a florist went to a barber for a haircut.
After the cut, he asked about his bill, and the barber replied, ‘I cannot accept money from you. I’m doing community service this week.’ The florist was pleased and left the shop..
When the barber went to open his shop the next morning, there was a ‘thank you’ card and a dozen roses waiting for him at his door.
Later, a cop comes in for a haircut, and when he tries to pay his bill, the Barber again replied, ‘I cannot accept money from you. I’m doing community service this week.’ The cop was happy and left the shop.
The next morning when the barber went to open up, there was a ‘thank you’ card and a dozen donuts waiting for him at his door.
Then a Congressman came in for a haircut, and when he went to pay his bill, the barber again replied, ‘I can not accept money from you. I’m doing community service this week.’ The Congressman was very happy and left the shop.
The next morning, when the barber went to open up, there were a dozen Congressmen lined up waiting for a free haircuts.
And that, my friends, illustrates the fundamental difference between the citizens of our country and the politicians who run it.
J. Palmer said:
Brilliant. Thanks, ira.
Raunak said:
J. this is so similar to what happens in India. Govt. approved vendors charge exorbitant prices…worse still is the level of corruption involved in becoming a govt. approved vendor. The system is rotten and I’m surprised that a country such as the US is facing such bureaucratic evils.
Bubba said:
I agree with waste. I am pretty sure every citizen would agree to cutting waste. But if the government has no incintive to cut waste why would they. Cut their budget then they will get creative, just like corporations today that are doing more with less driving their profits. Even in the “crisis” today Obama is not talking about how to improve efficiency with these budget cuts, he his out on the campaign trail trying to scare the american public. 2% cut is nothing when you are spending 3 trillion a year, it takes us back to spending levels 2 years ago, hardly the crisis that is being portrayed. So why try to go out and scare the public of these drastic cuts???
I will have to disagree on your miliary contractor example just becasue the contractor gets 150k a year for maybe 5 years or so where the soldier gets 50K a year for 20 years they retires with health benefits for life and i think 80% of pay for life.
Bubba said:
The past 10 years air traffic has decreased 27% but the FAA’s budget has increased 46%. And I am susposed to belive that a 2% cut is going to increase lines by an hour at the airport, airports are going to close, less security screening, and some airports will operate with out controllers?
Bubba said:
ANd Senator Coburn is always coming out with these reports of waste and overlapping programs. Why is nothing ever done about it? Becasue the money supply is always kept on.